The Independent Uganda: You get the Truth we Pay the Price
Kampala, Uganda | THE INDEPENDENT | President Yoweri Museveni has written to Justice Minister Kahinda Otafire, warning that no action should be taken on Uganda Telecom Ltd (UTL), without Cabinet approval.
“As I have guided on several occasions, given the strategic importance of UTL to the economy, government has been in the process of identifying a suitable investor to partner with to revamp UTL as opposed to divesting it. The above position was also taken by Cabinet,” Museveni said.
“Therefore, no action contrary to Cabinet’s position should be taken. Further, Cabinet must always be consulted on any investment or related decisions concerning UTL before they are taken.”
Otafiire has now written to the administrator of Administrator of Uganda Telecom Limited Bemanya Twebaze, who is from the Uganda Registration Services Bureau (URSB), to expedite the search for a strategic investor.
State minister for investment Evelyn Anite had in the past month attempted to have the administrator Bemanya Twebaze replaced, despite opposition from the Attorney General’s office.
In a letter dated June 26, 2019, Anite directed the Attorney General to apply to the court for orders replacing Bemanya Twebaze as the Administrator of Uganda Telecom Limited (UTL). On Friday, The Deputy Attorney General Mwesigwa Rukutana disregarded the directive saying that the Finance Minister has no supervisory powers over the Administrator.
Bemanya was appointed Administrator of UTL following the exit of Ucom Limited, a Libyan owned firm that owned 69 per cent shares in March 2017. He entered into an Administration Deed and the shareholders ceded.
Early this week, the Attorney General William Byaruhanga also advised that there cannot be an audit of the administrators’ activities in Uganda Telecom Limited until the administration process elapses.
According to a letter addressed to the Minister of Finance, Byaruhanga says the administrator Bemanya Twebaze is only bound to make reports on the progress of administration to the creditors of the company and furnish copies to court, the official receiver and the registrar of companies.
The latest communication comes at the backdrop of letters by state minister for investment Anite stating that the government has encountered considerable difficulty dealing with the Administrator and completely lost confidence in his ability to continue serving the role.
Rukutana explained that the grounds to remove an administrator must relate to failure to comply with the duties imposed on the Administrator under the Administration Deed, the Insolvency Act or any other law or any orders and directions of court adding that he had not found any fault on the part of the Administrator that warrants his removal.
Rukutana further faulted Anite’s quest for Bemanya’s removal on grounds that it undermines a ruling by the Speaker of Parliament Rebecca Kadaga who clearly stated that administration is a Court-controlled process and that neither the legislature nor the executive should interfere with.
But moments after Rukutana’s opinion, Anite stated that the response points to a confirmation of a view that Bemanya Twebaze is a crooked Lawyer entrenched in the Attorney General’s office. She said that a cartel in sections of government is keen to have UTL liquidated and sell to themselves the strategic assets of the company.
She further instructed the Attorney General to apply to the court to replace him, regardless of the advice of the Deputy Attorney General.
But in a letter dated July 1, Byaruhanga maintained the position by his deputy and reaffirmed that the audit cannot happen when the office of the Auditor-general declined to conduct the audit. According to the letter, a request to the auditor general was rejected on grounds that since the company is under administration, which is a court controlled process, this may potentially pose legal challenges.
“Therefore, it is my view that during the period of administration the progress of the process can be ascertained from the reports furnished to the above-named parties under the Law. However, I am of the view that an audit of the administrator’s activities can only be undertaken upon conclusion of the process which in this instance expires on November 22, 2019,” reads the letter.
Byaruhanga adds that the office of the Auditor General is not supposed to work under directions or control of any person or authority. The Attorney General further advises that the minister may choose to request them to pursue this option only if there is evidence that the administrator is not complying with his duties under the administration Deed, the Insolvency Act and any other law or any orders or directions of the court.
