Wednesday , November 6 2024

Why appointment of new UNBS head seems controversial

Lawyer demands explanation of the legality of Eng. Nkamwesiga (In picture) appointment

Kampala, Uganda | THE INDEPENDENT | Controversy has arisen over the appointment of Eng James Kwesiga Nkamwesiga as Executive Director, of Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS) announced last week.

UNBS announced Nkamwesiga successful candidate from the selection exercise that started in January with the advertisement of the position until then occupied, in acting capacity, by Daniel Nangalama.

The interviews featured three tests or assessments with the total results being circulated against 100 points. These were: Psychometric Assessment; Written Technical Test; and PowerPoint Presentation and Oral Interview.

While the tests had different weights on the final result, the assessment guidelines stated that none of the assessments should be considered in isolation but rather wholesomely.

“This is the reason why the overall score if it is above the cut-off, 60 percent, should be considered as a good basis for recommending a candidate for further consideration…”

The documents from the assessment show that Muyambi Fortunate Benda scored 79.9 percent, while Segawa Apollo scored 79.25, and Nkamwesiga 63.12 percent.

The results sheet also shows that Ajer Basil got 61.46 and Akankiza Samson Mpiira 60.46, while Nkwanga Joachim Charles was 46.74 percent.

A simple analysis of the the outcomes for the top three shows that in the Psychometric Assessment, Muyambi scored 86 out of 100, Nkamwesiga 78, and Segawa 77.

In written technical tests, Muyambi got 77, followed by Segawa with 76, while Nkamwesiga scored 48.

In the PowerPoint presentation and oral interview, the total points were 60. The results show that Muyambi scored 46.27, and Segawa 51, while Nkamwesiga scored 38.77.

Despite five candidates scoring higher than the cut-off point, the standards council recommended to the minister the top two.

“Please find the report of the interviews conducted for your consideration. The 9th National Standards Council hereby recommends the best two candidates as highlighted in the report,” says the statement signed by the NSC Chairman, Charles Musekuura.

It has now surfaced that Nkamwesiga came third out of the six candidates that were on the final shortlist.

On May 14, 2024, one Ahimbisibwe George wrote a complaint letter through his lawyers, Wanambugo & Company Advocates, to the Attorney General over what he referred to as an “illegal appointment” on Eng Kwesiga.

Ahimbisibwe, describing himself as a concerned citizen, contends that the Minister of Trade, Industry and Cooperatives, appointed a person “who was not recommended” by the National Standards Council after the interviews.

“The appointment by the Minister is illegal and contrary to the UNBS Act as he did not act by the recommendations of the Board as required by the current law,” the lawyers say.

They ask the Attorney General to advise “and prevail over the Minister so that he can reverse his illegal appointment.”

Mustapha Mugisa, a business management consultant at Summit Consulting says the minister was in his power and could have based his decision on “other factors” that matter.

“Anyone with 60 percent or above is good, based on the assessment tools used. The appointing authority has leeway to select a qualifying candidate who meets the requirements.”

****

URN

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *