Wednesday , November 6 2024

X BATTLE: Mwenda vs Spire and the rest

Kampala, Uganda | THE INDEPENDENT | Hours after Andrew Mwenda, print, radio and television journalist, who is also founder and owner of The Independent, penned a comment that responded to human rights lawyer Nicholas Opiyo’s tweet on CDF General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, all hell broke lose on X. One of the first shots was fired by Jimmy Spire Ssentongo, professor, academic, columnist, portraitist, author, human rights defender and editorial cartoonist.

Here’s a record of how it started, and where we are…. 

Nicolas Opiyo’s attack on Muhoozi

JIM SPIRE SSENTONGO:  I want to believe @AndrewMwenda but doing so also requires that I conclude that MK doesn’t write the things on his X account. But he has never denied writing them! How are we supposed to believe that the person who, almost consistently, tweets conspicuously unwise things is very intelligent? How do we accommodate the contradiction that a room is both empty and full at the same time!

Like @nickopiyo , I’ve never met or listened to the man debate anywhere. So, I only judge by what he selects to put out here on X and in his recent short read speeches (which I imagine he takes his time to think through before sharing). To his compliment, his tweets are often very well written- hardly any careless language mistakes, and well summarised. But that’s often all there is. Perhaps he could surprise us with a non-scripted interview on national television, just one, of about 1 hour, being asked random questions that require reasoning and EI. We could be very wrong. Perhaps the X character is a malignant impersonator. Perhaps it is us who are not intelligent enough to see the great wisdom in the man’s tweets.

ANDREW MWENDA: It’s not that you lack the intelligence to read and understand the message in his tweets. You are so prejudiced against him (your assumption that he is not intelligent) and this leads your brain to be blind to the message behind his tweets, the intellectual content in them.

SPIRE: But then you realise that, with such an argument, intelligence becomes an arbitrary attribute. I would similarly sophistically argue (by reverse) that you are too close to him and this leads your brain to be blind to the lack of substance in the tweets. But I know that it’s not the way to make an argument regarding a dispute on fact. Speak to the content of tweets and speeches in question.

MWENDA: Since the reverse can apply to my judgment of Muhoozi, I suggest you ask @YusufSerunkuma  on his understanding of Muhoozi’s tweets. I saw him on tv giving a much more thoughtful insight on them, their content and meaning. And he has never met Muhoozi

SPIRE: Then again one of us didn’t understand @YusufSerunkuma ’s apparently sarcastic submission. But that doesn’t matter. Even if he affirmed the intelligence in the said tweets, would that endorsement become our yardstick because it’s from Yusuf? Does the presence or absence of sense in a thing necessarily depend on who says it is there? As I said above, that’s not how to argue on a matter of fact. Let the tweets and speeches be assessed on their own merits or lack thereof.

MWENDA: Actually you dismissed my opinion on his tweets arguing that I am suffering from the very confirmation bias I accused you of. So I chose a third party who doesn’t like or agree with Muhoozi. Again you interpret Yusuf’s insights differently from me. Lesson?

SPIRE: You might need to revisit my response then. I simply used the reverse of your accusation to demonstrate to you that it’s not the logical way to argue. I was not providing a standard. I ended by urging you to speak to the tweets and speeches in dispute, not my positionality.

MWENDA: You see Muhoozi’s tweets using lenses tinted with prejudice just as you see mine as tinted by love and loyalty to a friend. But my appreciation of Muhoozi’s intellectual gifts was the cause of our intellectual engagement lasting decades, not a a result of it.

One comment

  1. These two scriptures come to mind:
    Ecclesiastes 9:11 KJV
    I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.
    and,
    1 Corinthians 1:27 KJV
    But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *